Island Opinions

Island Opinions (727)

PHILIPSBURG, St. Maarten - Through time we have sought destinations away from home for our leisure. In creating traditions annual family vacation were often planned and enjoyed to bond, enhance the love for one another and to have joyful experiences.

Experiences to last a lifetime. In fact through such vacations permitted exposure to other cultures and religions bringing a vast knowledge and experience that would permit us to better partake in the world.

Throughout our youth many of us were rewarded with travel abroad after having completed a school year successfully. Travel was for a longtime associated with, pleasure, adventure, and mere enhancement of personal wellbeing. Travel however is undertaken with greater frequency for business.

Business growth and so economic development have been contingent on expansion of market opportunities exceeding borders. Whilst telecommunications now enable business to be undertaken anywhere any time, in a global environment this means of communication has not mitigated the importance of travel. So travel is done by means of vehicular transport (over continents having such connections), by train, ship or aircraft. In an article written by Chris Isidore for CNN money[i] the many means of travel were compared based on the number of fatalities over a five year period. It was established that scale most dangerous to least dangerous was represented as follows: Motorcycles-cars and trucks-trains-metros/subways-busses-planes.

One may assume that these figures were based on the fatalities caused during a crash of such transportation means. However anno 2016 we should question if the fatalities which occur in and around airports, train stations and metro stations should be considered as fatalities related to the transportation means being sought. Terrorism attacks have in a short period of time made most means of mass transportation to be the most dangerous means of transportation.

The utilization of aircrafts, the bombing of metro stations and recent bombings in the departure hall of the Brussels airport are just some of the examples in which the use of certain transportation means are targeted, simply because of the greater number of people that are transported by such means at any given time. For years we believed that travel by air or by train were by far the safest means of transportation, that believe is now rapidly dissipating. The use of such transportation means now may make us sitting ducks in and enclosed pond, highly vulnerable to malicious attacks.

The open borders in Europe once seen as the means to attain a European Union, a higher form of economic development through trade and free movement of people, may now be the cause of its vulnerability to terrorist attacks. It is suggested that many more attacks are in the planning and probably execution phase, cautioning travel to Europe. Yet we have seen that acts of terrorism are not confined to any area, continent or country.

In fact its non-discriminatory nature is the reason why no country can become complacent or deem itself not a target. With that being said would it be conceivable that travelers would find themselves playing Russian roulette with their lives every time travel by aircraft, train, metro or even by ship was ventured? That realization may have far fetching consequences for destinations strongly dependent on tourism. How do we ensure that travel through these means remains the least dangerous means of transportation? What is required to maintain safety and security so that travel not only for business but for leisure continues? Has St Maarten embarked on this journey to ensure that travel to the country remains a desired and safe option? World events as far as they may seem, can have an impact on us so it is essential that mechanisms are put in place in the country to aid in the fight against acts of terrorism.

Compliance with FATF recommendations as set forth in the AML/CFT (Anti Money Laundering /Combating the financing of terrorism) standards is a step in the right direction.

What’s the safest way to travel May 13, 2015


PHILIPSBURG, St. Maarten - What past do St. Martiners (Sint Maarteners & Saint Martinoise) long for, when they talk about the good old days? St. Martiners have been described as those Born Here and those Born to be Here.

This nonethnic and non-racial definition, brilliantly introduced by the honourable governor of the island, Drs. Eugene Holiday, is meant to be both accommodating and normative. St Martiners are those who put the island first. They are patriots, persons who love the island. Dr. Louis Jeffry who can trace back his ancestry to the time of slavery, and Father Charles, the island’s revered Catholic priest, who was born on Saint Lucia, equally qualify.

I found this definition rather inclusive until I spoke to my long-time friend, Ruford Serrant, who I dare say was one of the first St. Martiners I got to know. Ruford was born on Dominica but having arrived on the island at a young age, he knows the island inside out. He is one of those Born to be Here St. Martiners. I fell in love with the island due to persons like him. For Ruford St. Martiners were simply those persons Who Are Here.

Among all of those Who Are Here, you will encounter many who are not deeply patriotic, in other words, those who are not necessarily in love with the island.  They may be here on St. Martin as a means to escape poverty and earn a decent living, a step towards career advance, a rite de passage after graduating, an internship, a flight from an oppressive family, or as a way to get rich quick. In addition, Ruford continued there were those who were Born Here—locals—who simply feel that the powers that be have abandoned them, and they actually did not want to be Here. Knowing my position, he reasoned that the mission of education was to find a way of making all those Who Are Here—who are fed up— acquire a sense that they were Born to be Here.

I took his advice earnestly, and recognized that one had to start listening with a charitable ear to the cries of dissatisfaction of those Who Are Here. When they state their anger in terms of “long ago things were better when locals were in charge” or “where I come from we do it better” or “this is such a corrupt country”, it is quite unhelpful to answer them by calling them a “xenophobic racist” or telling them “you too ungrateful, go back to your own country”. Engagement with them about the past they are referring to clarified matters for them and for me, and made me better able to hear and recognize their cries as a plea for more decency.

Here is what I learnt:  
The past and the former country the dissatisfied here on St. Martin refer to is not something that ever was. It is a country to come and a past in the making. I will limit my examples to the St. Martiners from the Netherlands and the St. Martiners referred to as locals. Locals who speak about the good old days, are surely not referring to the days when those with a lighter skin tone would refer to their darker skinned brothers and sisters as niggas. They are not talking about the days when the latter group could not reside in Simpson Bay. They are not talking about the days when those with money and political power and a proper surname, regardless of the colour of their skin, had to be called mister and miss
even when one knew that they were cheating and oppressing you (the poor white and black locals). They are referring to the dream and the work they did to create a society where all locals enjoyed the benefit of upward mobility, showed respect towards each other, and displayed solidarity regardless of name, skin, or size of pocketbook and they sense that this dream is being impeded by the indecency and greed of the powerful today.   
Similarly, when St. Martiners from the Netherlands rave about the enlightened nature of their place of birth, they are not talking about the country that after World War 2 engaged in the murdering of 150.000 Indonesians who simply wanted their independence, nor are they referring to the terrible fact that of the 140.000 Jews residing in the Netherlands, 107.000 were deported to Nazi Germany (the Netherlands ranks highest percentage wise with regard to the extermination of Jews during the war). And they were not talking about the country that bore the blight of being a slave trader and slave maker; or the discrimination of Catholics up until the 1950s, or their former country’s wilful participation in a global socioeconomic system that is strangling the vast majority of humankind.  I understood that what they are referring to is their hope to live in a country that lived up to the creed of equality, liberty, and fraternity.

These examples can be multiplied by talking about the Indian-St. Martiners, the American St. Martiners, etc. Time and again I found that the past and the country they are referring to actually never existed. It is a thing of the future. Among all those Who Are Here, there is a longing to inhabit a future where respect, solidarity, liberty, equality, and fraternity is concretized by having upward mobility as the norm; this is what binds us; our common pursuit; yet regrettable we often forget it.

To get there, to get to this Promised Land where everyone is valid and feels validated, we will all have to plant the seeds for this future. In conversations with Ruford and several of the signatories of this piece, the USM has come up with a ritual enactment that will make us remember what binds us. It is based upon a St. Martin that the old folks know. One where there was an abundance of fruit trees on the hill tops that allowed everyone some nutrition; trees that were fairly sturdy against wind storms. In the ideal past they were part of the commons: the property of all, and thus cared for by all. St. Martiners of various social classes met each other and exchanged while picking fruit. It was our public sphere. I can remember as a little boy following Ruford up the hills where we enjoyed mangoes and tamarind with boys and girls from other neighbourhoods. And I am sure many of you who have been on the island for some time have similar experiences. To be together and to hear each other, we have to leave our comfort zones.

Coming October the Student Government Association (SGA) of the USM, chaired by Ms. Kiran Manglani, will do hikes throughout the island and replant the fruit trees on our many hills. The American University of the Caribbean (AUC) has also committed. We will need the help of experts in hiking, persons who know about planting, and business and individuals who are willing to donate seeds—of mango, tamarind, knepa, cashew, and other fruit trees. The coming weeks and months, SGA representatives will be contacting you—and you can contact us—to make this a reality. The SGA, board, management, staff of the USM, and the list of distinguished signatories, pledge to do weekly hikes for 12 months caring for these seedlings as their commitment to remember what we share in common.

On these hikes and care for our common habitat, the island, St. Martiners of all walks of life will have the opportunity to dialogue about that which matters most to them in a respectful manner, and establish friendships and create partnerships for the betterment of all. Join us and let us converse truthfully with each other while we plant the seeds of our past in the making. A public meeting and a press conference will be organized after the carnival period to further concretize this collective effort with you.

Authored by Dr. Francio Guadeloupe – President of the University of St. Martin Lorraine Talmi – President of the SHTA Kiran Manglani – President of the USM Student Government Association
Cosignatories Tamara Leonard – Member of Parliament Leona Marlin – Romeo – Member of Parliament Dr. Cornelius DeWeever – Member of Parliament Maurice Lake – Member of Parliament Silveria Jacobs – Minister of Education, Culture, Youth and Sports Affairs Oldine Bryson-Pantophlet – Chairwoman or Social Economic Council Mercedes Wyatt Wycliffe Smith Jordie Halman –  Researcher The University of Amsterdam    Micheal Benjamin – Integrated Health and Rehab

PHILIPSBURG, St. Maarten - During the recent budget deliberations in Parliament the query on how a higher tax compliance would be ensured was answered by the Minister of Finance along the lines that prompter action would be undertaken after one issued warrant of payment to the tax payer. This response seemed to satisfy the Member of Parliament who posted the question. This response however suggests that higher tax compliance will be sought from those tax payers who are already in the system and paying taxes.

These taxpayers are too often confronted with bogus assessments on supposed late payments, simply because the receiver and the tax department do not have a synchronized system permitting the latter to instantaneously view the payments made by the receiver. Almost on a monthly basis tax payers are forced to issue payment receipts, issued by the receiver, to the tax department in protest of a baseless warrant for payment (due to supposed non-payment or late payment) issued by the tax department. If this protest (sending a proof of payment from their own system back) is not filed the promised new actions may not be prevented.

Yes, at times the tax payer may not have paid enough and receives a warrant for additional payment. In such cases immediate real action to collect may be expected sooner, well soon after all legal remedies have been exhausted.

Yet this promise of prompter action alone will not translate in enhanced tax compliance in the country. For it is not only those who are registered and paying taxes that are supposed to bring about a higher compliance. Is it not a fact that currently a small portion of society is carrying a far larger portion of not registered, non tax paying entities? Enhanced tax compliance should coincide with the promise to broaden the tax payer base and to ensure that those who are operating outside of the system are introduced to the obligations others have fulfilled for years.

To highlight a few examples of entities that should be brought in to broaden the tax payer base:

1] There are so many entities who enjoy a tax holiday without expiry date. The tax holiday was intended to permit a viable start-up to these businesses. Being in business for years now may be a reason to assume that the tax holiday may now be withdrawn and these businesses may now be included in the group of tax payers.

2] Businesses, not registered or licensed, are offering products and services, generating revenues outside the system and having no contribution obligation as they are not known. The fact that these businesses are undermining our secure business environment is one consequence, that they are permitted to engage in unfair competition practices is another.

3] Some individuals, who should be part of the tax payer group, simply abuse the dual tax system between Dutch and French St. Maarten and ultimately do not contribute in any jurisdiction. These individuals declare at our tax department that they are declaring and paying on the French side and on the French side they declare to have a foreign income and are paying in a foreign territory. The Tax department on the Dutch side seems to be satisfied with that declaration and undertakes nothing to verify with the French counterpart on this declaration and payment. So many prominent and outstanding citizens, misuse this dual tax system, generate an income and pay no one.

4] Then there are the villa rentals conducted, through which revenues are generated in the Island, yet it remains unclear if this income is taxed in any jurisdiction.

Is this not a tax compliance issue as well even if it can easily be qualified as tax evasion? Yet no one deals with these forms of tax evasion (permitted or not), and of course that is simply because these evaders are not known. The promised actions above can only help to enhance the tax compliance of the known tax payer who did not file or pay correctly when prosecuted for tax evasion. The real tax evaders look on, comment and criticize those “caught” for improper tax compliance.

The need for more revenues by the country should have placed a focus on this segment of society as well, instead of a continued focus only on those known and within easy reach. Enhancement of tax compliance is therefore much more and should be much more than the promised action against the known tax payers. Enhancement of tax compliance should include all those businesses in operation under the radar and all those citizens who peddle between Dutch and French side. A simple declaration that you are declaring elsewhere should not be sufficient, this declaration should at least be supported by a copy of that foreign declaration filed. That is a start and not a costly one at that. We can only hope that tax compliance from all will be sought and not just from a few.

ST. PETERS, St. Maarten – The buzz words in the streets today is that the NA lead government is following in the same footsteps of the previous UP lead government.

This time around they are doing everything within their power to destroy one of the last business fabrics that is owned 100% by locals, the operators of school busses.

This NA government is fully aware that by putting the transportation of school children out on bid that many of the bus owners would not be able to participate in the bid. I can remember many years ago that this same party that is leading the government today was a party for the people, by the people and with the people.

In those days a Dutch technical assistance could never head a government department to the contrary, a local had to be the head and the technical assistant part of the supporting staff. There were talks about public/private partnership to assist local land owners who didn’t have the knowledge to develop their land to enter an agreement with the government to acquire that type of assistance. But all those great ideas and initiatives have been thrown out the windows and instead replaced with draconian proposals to destroy our own people in the name of good governance or to generate savings when it suits them.    

     The OSPP has taken note of the fact that our Honorable Minister of Education, Ms. Silveria Jacobs has suspended the bidding process for the outsourcing of the school bus transportation. We commend her for that decision, nevertheless we still expect this bidding process to be totally withdrawn and that common sense would once again prevail.              
     The One St. Maarten People Party is proposing to assist our existing local school bus operators by firstly providing them with a contract for four years. Secondly, that these same school bus operators must adhere to all the requirements set forth in the terms of reference that was issued for the bidding process for the new school year 2016 -2017. By providing the school bus operators with a four year contract they can use it as a means of security to acquire the necessary financing to upgrade their busses to meet those requirements that were outlined in the terms of reference. Let us preserve the few local entrepreneurs that are still benefiting from this billion dollar economy of St. Maarten. Perhaps it is time for this government to encourage more locals to go into business by establishing a loan guarantee program and not destroy the few local entrepreneurs that still exist.

     And if the Minister of Education truly wants to make those critical investments in education with the funds that she was projecting from the savings by putting the school bus transportation on bid, the OSPP is proposing that she table a proposal in the meeting of the Council of Ministers to have NV GEBE change the commercial rates that it is charging all the school boards to residential rates.

In that same proposal she must state that all the government owned companies must adopt various schools to install solar panels to commence during this year summer school vacation. Most of the school boards are paying approximately 26,000.00 guilders a month to NV GEBE for electricity and water.

Between these two proposals the schools would save in excess of ten thousand guilders a month in utility cost, an annual projected savings of over 120,000.00 guilders per school board. Honorable Minister of Education, Ms. Jacobs these savings would certainly be a great help to those critical investment plans you have.

PHILIPSBURG, St. Maarten - Over the past year the University of the Virgin Islands has embarked on a journey to broadcast and highlight their mission against sexual misconduct.

After the surfacing of many rumors regarding inappropriate relationships between student and faculty it was felt that UVI had to take a stance against sexual misconduct.

The mission statement was clear and loud. “Not at UVI.” However, despite the catchy slogan sexual misconduct still occurs at UVI between both faculty and students

Over and throughout the last week an apparent sexual misconduct claim surfaced throughout UVI and has been the discussion of many. One student in particular has accused another of blackmailing her for sexual favors.

This student was said to have taken sexually explicit digital photographs of the victim and used them as collateral to extort her for sexual favors. This media house has since then learned the identity of the accused as a Mr. Duane Thompson, a student hailing from the twin island of St. Kitts and Nevis. In the past Thompson has been a candidate/performer in the V.I Idol competition.

Upon further investigation this media house also learned that the origin of the victim whom sources have indicated hails from North Carolina and holds a “Freshman” status at the University.

To encounter such a Quid pro Quo exploit during her first year at UVI is unfortunate and as a media house we extend our sympathies on the matter. No student should be faced with sexual misconduct in any University particularly not one which has taken a firm stance against the matter.

UVI’s message is clear. “Say no to sexual misconduct. Not at UVI.” However, looming questions still linger. Why is it that the accused young man, in spite of implicating evidence and testimony from the victim, still walks and predates UVI’s corridors? What will President Hall do to remedy this crime and ensure peace of mind for the victim? Will UVI still reward the accused a degree regardless of his blatant misconduct?

These questions are critical and this media house waits in anticipation to learn the outcome. Recently, UVI has appointed a new director of its housing operations: Ms. Jennifer Palmer Crawford, the Dean of students herself; Ms. Verna Rivers is also newly appointed.

It should be the pertinent responsibility of these members of faculty along with President David Hall to combat this situation and remedy it swiftly. After all, the message against sexual misconduct is one that has been ringing loudly in both student and faculty ears, the crime is abusive and real and the institution is best suited holding firm to their message. “Not at UVI.”

PHILIPSBURG, St. Maarten - The first idea that may come up when reading this heading is that this article pertains to the strength category of a hurricane.
A Cat I hurricane we simply do not fear anymore in St. Maarten, as after Luis and Marilyn in 1995 we learned how to prepare. CAT I in this article has no relation to the tropical storms we face. Category I is the status our Civil Aviation Authority must have and maintain, if there is a desire by the country to maintain commercial flights to the United States or maintain codeshare arrangements with US partner airliners. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) assesses the ability of the country’ civil aviation authority to oversee air carriers in its territory. This ability is measured based on the compliance with the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) safety standards for the industry. The assessment is executed through the International Aviation Safety Assessment program (IASA) and focusses on eight (8) key elements of aviation safety as set forth in the ICAO Safety Oversight Manual- document number 9734. The eight (8) key requirements of compliance are:

1] Primary aviation legislation;

2] Specific operating regulations;

3] State civil aviation system and safety oversight functions;

4] Technical personnel qualification and training;

5] Technical guidance, tools and the provision of safety critical information;

6] Licensing, certification, authorization, and approval obligations;

7] Surveillance obligations; and

8] resolution of safety concerns.[1]                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

The Netherlands Antilles enjoyed the category I status as being part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, but that all changed in 2010 when Curacao and St. Maarten attained separate status within the Kingdom. The Curacao Civil Aviation Authority needed to undergo an inspection, and the deficiencies found resulted in a downgrade in 2012 to a category II status. This downgrade affected St. Maarten as well, due to the fact that the country’s the (PJ) aircraft registry prefix.[2] Even though this downgrade does not affect flights in operation, it does mean that no new flights/service can be undertaken by airlines from St. Maarten to the US and its territories. It is therefore of essence that a category I status is regained, since our economic development is contingent hereon. In this context we must realize that this young country having assumed the Civil Aviation Authority for the first time after the dismantling of the Netherlands Antilles, by far did not have the developed framework in place as was the case in Curacao. Yet with the limited means available the start-up of this entity commenced. The St. Maarten Civil Aviation Authority is functional today, yet not much attention is given to this entity. As a tourism destination and tourism being the main pillar of our economy one would think that the Government would take this matter on as a priority. The safety of our aviation industry is at stake here, yet we must fear that budget cuts may result in this matter not promptly being addressed. It is a known fact that many new authorities assumed since 10-10-10 placed a real burden on the country as many institutions were not present in the country before, the human resources and expertise often yet to be acquired. Yes we all know that Curacao did not keep its promises to help set up the many new institutions country St. Maarten would require, and may still not have transferred our share of the moneys out of the division of the Netherlands Antilles Estate, but if we follow the words of the Minister of Finance we can forget that our share will be released any time soon. So with a strapped budget, cuts left and right, healthcare requiring urgent attention, one can only assume that budget cuts will also affect the quest of the Civil Aviation Authority to regain a category I status. The hiring and training of staff may not be possible, the acquisition of equipment required may be delayed, the much needed regulations, which must undergo legal screening by Legal affairs, may follow a slow process as this division neither has the manpower nor the aviation expertise to truly execute a prompt screening. So how will this category I status be regained, if the importance hereof is not understood or simply mitigated? Yes we need to tighten our belt, but we also need to ensure that we are a safe destination for incoming and outgoing aircrafts, as we depend on this means of transportation for our entire socio-economic growth. The tourism industry- the aviation industry- brings us the much needed revenues, and these revenues will not grow if we are unable to meet aviation safety standards. If expansion of airlift to US territories is deemed part of our further development as a destination, then we need to get our priorities straight. So maybe it is time to set the politics aside. Budget cuts, should go hand in hand with the clearing of a polluted Government payroll, and hiring should be done in areas most needed. Maybe those still on the Government payroll who have not worked for the administration in years and are generating income through other jobs as well, should be taken off that payroll. In the interest of the country those who are needed and are willing to work should be hired. If a clean-up is undertaken this Government would be surprised at the amount of revenues it would have to hire qualified, young St. Maarteners who are hungry to contribute towards their country. Yet this clean-up should not be expected in an election year. Considering all the afore the question remains: “are the budget cuts undertaken the right ones, in the right areas, without creating additional liabilities?” For if these cuts are the sole basis for the Government to operate on a balanced budget, areas requiring urgent attention and staffing will be left unattended. Whilst balancing a budget on paper the reality will be that fragmented budget cuts will harm us in the long run, and will prevent economic growth.Category I will remain a desired status by the Civil Aviation Authority to be attained.


[1] FAA website: IASA program;

[2] Curacao Chronicle December 2014.

PHILIPSBURG, St. Maarten -

Dear Minister Meyers:

The residents of Downstreet are becoming very concerned with the situation we currently face. Imagine we are living in 2016 and at this time in our history we are forced to walk the street in utter darkness . Every citizen on this island listened carefully to the budget debate, and we are now wondering why your government is treating the residents  of Lower Backstreet  in this manner. There must be a good reason why the entire town has street lights except in this area where we reside. WE have heard about the shotgun budget that has just  passed in your parliament however , we the residents of downtown are wondering if this part of town was part of Minister Gibson’s budget cuts. If that is the case then we find it very unfair since the rest of Philipsburg has not been affected.

Imagine for a minute no lights on Frontstreet. How would you as Minister of Vromi react? I can assure you that a phone call from the Indian merchants association or the SHTA would have had the entire VROMI in overdrive trying to restore the lights as soon as possible.

Now minister we the residents of Downstreet are not as not as powerful as the Indian Merchants Association nor SHTA, but as voters we demand equal treatment. Our safety is at stake and this matter must be addressed immediately.

As the minister of Vromi we urge you to find a solution. You are invited to take a drive through Philiipsburg  tonight and witness the utter darkness that we must endure in 2016. Our road is a mess, with potholes and now no lights. The situation is ideal for criminals to hide out and not be seen. Are we to wait until someone gets killed or maimed

We as residents are appealing to you to find some money in your budget to get our street lights back on.

Cordially yours,

The Downstreet Residents..

PHILIPSBURG, St. Maarten -

I want to know
How could someone
Sell their vote
Then end up the next
Day broke
I want te know

I want te know
How they could have
Soo many vote Buyers
And no one can find
The seller
I want te know
How come tis the
The buyer they put in
The cellar.
But no body Accusing
The seller
How come ?
Ah Want te know
Because yeh can't
Have a buyer without
Ah seller
Sorry te make ah sale
Yeh need ah buyer
And ah seller
Cauz a buyer without a seller
Is like ah bread without flour
So tell me why yeh putting
The buyer in the cellar
And no body Arresting
The seller
Please tell me how come
I will like te know
Why the biggest vote catcher
Ain't  he the vote buyer
And why the seller
Ain't going in the cellar
Cauz if vote buying
Is a crime wha happen
Te vote selling
Unless them politicians
Are  magicians
And tis only they who buying
BUT te ain't no body selling
Please tell me
For ah want te know
People selling their souls
And still going to haven
But for vote buying
You go straight TE hell
He who buy ends up in the cell
While  the others  are free to sell
What's the difference nobody
Can tell
Don't ask don't tell
Otherwise u go flying te hell
On nothing but a peanut shell


PHILIPSBURG, St. Maarten - I would like to make public, that when I got involved in the  discussions about finding a suitable location on Dutch St Maarten for a Water Treatment Facility, the country was already facing the end of an extended period and deadline placed by the EU Funding agency. I was informed that St Maarten had requested and received an extension and that extension was nearing its end.

In July Of last year I was requested to sit in on a meeting with then Prime Minister and Minister of VROMI a.t. Marcel Gumbs along various department heads of VROMI and its Acting SG to discuss the possibility of acquiring land to make this fading opportunity for a multi million dollar facility a reality for the island and its people.
At that meeting we all agreed on a possible way forward and presented that to the representative of Princes Port de Plaisance Mr. Hakan, who also took part in the discussions. 
What was also negotiated was an extra 1000 square meters of land in Cole Bay to develop a community center for the people of Cole Bay. As the representative and not the ultimate decision maker of the Princes Group, Mr Hakan promised  that he would get back to Government on its requests and offers. A few weeks later the principles of PDP responded favorably to Governments request and the process finalize the agreement continued under my leadership as Minister of VROMI. 
Before leaving office I set in motion the processes to finalize this agreement and as soon as the NA led government took office they immediately began the process of reversing this and other decisions such as the agreements made with APS to develop homes for the civil Service, the plans for PDP to develop its Kim-Sha property where they had agreed to construct public parking in Kim-Sha which was a prerequisite of government, all of these efforts were made to have direct positive impact and effects on the economy and for people of St Maarten.
Now I read in the local media that Prime Minister William Marlin has decided to construct and island in the lagoon to build water treatment facility on. Here the island will have to invest millions unnecessarily, not mentioning yet another delay in the EU funded project in addition to further destruction of the ego system of the lagoon. For these haphazard not well planned out reasons the international community doesn't take us seriously as a country.
For those who have been critical of the decision to grant Princess Port de Plaisance the property on Kim-Sha beach must be informed that the company already own property on Kim-Sha since the late 1980's and have been requesting Government for years for additional property to aid with the ingress and egress of their planned resort development. What they have also agreed to as a condition is that public parking would be part of the development on Kim-Sha. This would then allow for the public to have security surveillance public parking in this heavily commercial area as any parking facility in that area would require. 

It is shameful and embarrassing when for personal and political reasons government would ignore positive developments for shortsighted  and ignorant ambitions.

Claret M M Connor


MARIGOT, St. Martin -

We laid them stone bricks
And we pour your concrete
To build the foundation...
Of this here nation
We Da generation
Of sal pickers
We the well diggers
Your foundation and bricklayers
And we your co-labourors
We your pot washers
We your bartenders
And your cook helpers
Spicing up your delicious
So for your guest you could show off
While we work we asses off
To build your economy
Now you just simply
Forget about we
And take we out the
Censors and off your Registry
Now that you can import
Cheap labour
From other areas
You leave we here to suffer
Hoping that dementia
Will eat we memory
So you can thief we pension money
But thank God for we children
That we sent to school
And who your can't fool
And now, contrary
Te we, they can read
And understand your treaty
So no longer can you
Hide Knowledge from we
like a set ah durty crooks
Cauzen now we chilren could read
And they writing their own books
So now we can relate to them we stories
And rewrite we own History
But most of all collect we money

Copyrights 2016
Big Ray

Page 9 of 52

International News

Go to top